Short summaries of recent Dutch Enterprise Chamber decisions. Open an individual page for a more detailed AI-assisted legal analysis and a link to the original Dutch judgment.
Decision: 15 October 2026 · ECLI:NL:GHAMS:2026:3004
The parties agreed on a share transfer but not on the price. The Enterprise Chamber appoints an expert to value the shares. The procedure shows how a shareholder dispute may be narrowed to the financial settlement.
Decision: 6 October 2026 · ECLI:NL:GHAMS:2026:2965
A prolonged dispute between two equal shareholders led to an irretrievable breakdown in cooperation. The Enterprise Chamber grants a shareholder's exit petition and orders an expert valuation. The inquiry petition and the counter-petition for compulsory transfer are dismissed.
Decision: 10 October 2026 · ECLI:NL:GHAMS:2026:2900
The Dutch Investors' Association (VEB) and other investors requested an inquiry into Philips' management in connection with problems involving sleep-apnoea and respiratory devices. The Enterprise Chamber rejects the jointly considered petitions. Serious difficulties and a product recall do not automatically establish sufficient grounds to doubt proper management.
Decision: 7 October 2026 · ECLI:NL:GHAMS:2026:2888
Minority shareholders objected to a proposed transaction within the OCI group. Following earlier interim measures, further valuation opinions and alternatives were considered. The Enterprise Chamber concludes that the concerns have been sufficiently addressed and declines to order an inquiry. The interim measures end on 1 January 2027.
Decision: 21 September 2026 · ECLI:NL:GHAMS:2026:2826
Following a dispute over the management of Monte Pizza, the company was left without an effective board. The Enterprise Chamber appoints an interim director with a casting vote to safeguard continuity. A final decision on the inquiry petition is deferred.
Decision: 13 August 2026 · ECLI:NL:GHAMS:2026:2249
The Enterprise Chamber orders an investigation into the management and affairs of Issue Information Technology B.V. from 19 October 2017 onwards. It also appoints an interim director with a casting vote and independent authority to represent the company.
Decision: 27 July 2026 · ECLI:NL:GHAMS:2026:2047
The Enterprise Chamber grants a petition to compel a shareholder to transfer shares and orders measures including the suspension of a director and the suspension of voting rights attached to shares.
Decision: 13 August 2026 · ECLI:NL:GHAMS:2026:2222
In a dispute concerning Villa ExpertCare B.V., the Enterprise Chamber considers an inquiry petition by the client council and an appeal concerning client participation. Although grounds for doubt are identified, it declines to order an inquiry after balancing the interests involved. The appeal against the decision of the national disputes committee is unsuccessful.
Decision: 16 June 2026 · ECLI:NL:GHAMS:2026:1692
In this squeeze-out procedure under Article 2:201a of the Dutch Civil Code, the Enterprise Chamber determines the price of shares to be transferred. The possibility of depositing the purchase price is also considered.
Decision: 21 July 2026 · ECLI:NL:GHAMS:2026:1988
The Enterprise Chamber declares the petitioner inadmissible in an inquiry concerning Investpharma B.V. The decision illustrates that standing and admissibility must be established before the merits of an inquiry request can be considered.
Decision: 24 July 2026 · ECLI:NL:GHAMS:2026:2024
The parties reach an amicable settlement and jointly request termination of the inquiry proceedings. The Enterprise Chamber grants the request, terminates the interim measures and releases the court-appointed director and share administrator from their duties.
Decision: 4 June 2026 · ECLI:NL:GHAMS:2026:1541
The Enterprise Chamber considers a joint request to determine the price of shares in Acvita companies. An expert is instructed to assess their value as at 31 December 2025.
Decision: 30 April 2026 · ECLI:NL:GHAMS:2026:1230
The Enterprise Chamber dismisses both a compulsory transfer petition and a shareholder exit petition, even though mismanagement had been established in earlier inquiry proceedings.
Decision: 1 May 2026 · ECLI:NL:GHAMS:2026:1193
In the dispute involving Logfret B.V., the statutory shareholding threshold for inquiry petitions is at issue. The Enterprise Chamber finds the petition inadmissible and rejects it insofar as it addresses the merits.
Source: published judgments on Rechtspraak.nl. Publication date and decision date are different.
Daily automatic updates are not yet active; reliable source retrieval and AI processing still need to be configured.