ROB VAN BIEZEN · Enterprise Chamber Updates · NL | EN
Published 16 September 2026 · Inquiry proceedings

Issue Information Technology – inquiry and interim director

Decision: 13 August 2026 · ECLI:NL:GHAMS:2026:2249

Important: AI-generated legal summary

This summary has not been independently verified by a lawyer and may contain errors. Read the original Dutch judgment before using this information. Disclaimer.

Summary

The Enterprise Chamber orders an investigation into the management and affairs of Issue Information Technology B.V. from 19 October 2017 onwards. It also appoints an interim director with a casting vote and independent authority to represent the company.

Legal significance

Combining an inquiry with interim measures can both investigate past conduct and safeguard a company's ability to function.

Procedural and factual context

An inquiry and interim measures perform complementary roles: investigating past management and protecting the company's ability to function in the meantime. They need not be justified by precisely the same considerations.

Legal analysis

The basis for doubting proper management should be distinguished from the necessity and scope of temporary board intervention. The exact facts supporting each measure must be checked in the judgment.

Practical implications

Each requested measure should be supported separately: what questions will an inquiry clarify, and which immediate risk or deadlock will the interim step address?

This additional AI-generated analysis draws on the available case description and has not been independently verified by a lawyer. Consult the full original Dutch decision for the facts, reasoning and operative order.

Original decision (Dutch)

Read the original Dutch decision ↗

← All decisions