This AI-assisted legal analysis has not been independently verified by a lawyer. Consult the original decision before relying upon it. Disclaimer.
Publication: 2 October 2026 · Decision: 24 September 2026
Facts
In the Buurtwonen joint venture between Buurtzorg and Hestia, a shareholder exit was granted earlier but an equitable price uplift and damages were refused.
Proceedings
On 10 August 2026 Hestia asked the court to reconsider its binding findings, relying on further conversations and messages.
Legal question
When may a binding interlocutory finding be reconsidered in ongoing proceedings?
Decision
The Enterprise Chamber refuses to revisit its earlier decisions.
Reasoning and paragraphs
Paragraph 3.1 explains the exceptional reconsideration test, referring to a Supreme Court ruling of 25 April 2008; paragraphs 3.2–3.3 reject the claimed new factual basis.
Legal significance
Further evidence alone does not require reopening an issue already conclusively decided.